Screw you, lilpixieofterror.
Wednesday, September 03, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
subscribe to PTETBlog Archive
-
▼
2008
(192)
-
▼
Sept
(58)
- Sarah Palin Speaks In Tongues
- Is Rexella loaded!?
- Does Obama Get a Free Ride?
- Free Sarah Palin
- Paranoid Whackjob Of The Day
- Sarah Palin: Swimsuit Diplomat
- Todd Snider - Conservative Christians
- Jesus Still Loves Sarah Palin
- Exclusive! Sarah Palin on Russia
- Jack Van Impe on Sarah Palin, World War III
- Billy Connolly On Religion
- Sarah Palin: Dinosaur Rider
- Theologyweb: Dumb for Jebus
- Chick Tracts go all webby
- Sarah Palin: Dinosaur Rapture
- Music In Hell (ft. Jack Van Impe)
- Intelligent Design: Dr Suess Stylee
- Is Sarah Palin Cthulhu in disguise!?
- Needless suffering disproves a loving God
- Deadly Iceberg of Romanism
- Quote Bank
- Guest Post: Denyse O'Leary
- Playmobil Security Check Point
- Sarah Palin *is* Rapture Ready
- Denyse on Worthwhile Discussion
- Family Guy Jesus Compilation
- I'm John McCain, and I am a liar..
- The Top Five Sarah Palin Songs
- Jesus and his Dinosaur Buddies
- Community Organizer
- Dense opines on Morality
- Rexella explains the Cthulhu Rapture
- A Bunch of C*****
- Baby Preacher Abomination
- Palin less scary, for some Dems
- Abstinence Only?
- Sarah Palin: babies, guns, Jesus
- Denyse O'Leary as glam as Sarah Palin
- Is Jesus Sarah Palin's Friend?
- Jebus Offends
- Palin: Huckabee in a frock?
- McCain/Palin - Selling Out Values
- America Needs Sarah Palin!!!!
- Watch Sarah Palin Squirm
- Glamorous Gran Contest
- HIV: A Ghibelline Plot!?
- Sarah Palin: Right Wing Hypocrisy
- Sarah Palin Shot Mom
- Palin’s sanctity of life
- Every Time You Leave A Comment, God Spares A Kitten
- Is Sarah Palin Rapture Ready?
- Like Sarah Palin, Jesus was never done
- Theologyweb. Worst. Forum. Evar.
- Palin Noob?
- My God Is Bigger Than Your God
- Keyword Analysis Beat Poetry 1a
- Who the feck is Sarah Palin?
- Power Of Prayer
-
▼
Sept
(58)
15 comments:
It's a badge of honor to get banned by someone like this. Not like when I got banned at televisionwithoutpity for something completely stupid.
Heh... Yeah, hilarious how people treat tv shows even more seriously and chlidishly than their beliefs in Gawd ;>
Ugh, I can't stand lilpixieofterror, that stupid, borderline illiterate bitch.
Hey anonymous. I'm sure lilpixie is very nice in real life. But as a moderator, she is woeful. I loved the "editorial criticism" in her notice to me. Then she had the gall to say she was told to "moderate" me by someone else.
Stupid and borderline illiterate, indeed.
But then, hey, she's a fundie on tWeb, so I shouldn't expect any more...
Seriously. Stop making us atheists look bad. It's damn right irritating, especially with all the work the rest of us put in to try and throw the preconceptions out.
That's pretty entertaining ptet. I don't know what is more entertaining, the fact you misquoted me on your quotes or the fact you are so dishonest that you didn't tell everybody how much of a jack ass you were. BTW I love the comments about being illiterate. I'm sure my English teacher would enjoy hearing that. I got a B in that class, how about you ptet? What are you college grades?
Who is anonymous? Too chicken to post your name?
So, basically, ptet didn't read the rules re: not being a jackass, and lilpixieofterror is bad for burning him for it. Whino.
Anonymous: I can tell you aren't a real atheist. First, I you didn't use he secret password. Second, you posted three minutes before lilpixieofterror. So I guess that makes you yet another liar for jesus.
lilpixieofterror: So nice of you to drop by. I didn't misquote you. Second, I linked to the thread, so everyone can see exactly how much of a "jack ass" I was. That's hardly "chicken". Third, I think you know fine well who "anonymous" is. Isn't there something in the Bible about bearing "false witness", or didn't your B in English get you that far?
frogwarrior: thanks for your contribution. that's not exactly what I was supposedly chastised for, but hey, good luck with the reading practice.
Do come again.
Reading that moderator notice, I see that it says something about "accusations of lying" and "veiled profanity." And those have nothing to do with being a jackass since when?
"Anonymous: I can tell you aren't a real atheist. First, I you didn't use he secret password. Second, you posted three minutes before lilpixieofterror. So I guess that makes you yet another liar for jesus."
Shows how stupid you are. He is chrs from Tweb. Lol. Way to go!
"lilpixieofterror: So nice of you to drop by. I didn't misquote you."
Oh yes you did, you didn't include the fact that you said some smart little remark to me to the effect of, "I hope you meet Jebus someday" and my remark was responding back. I assure you that I have the conversations on file if anybody wants to read them to see how much of a liar you are.
"Second, I linked to the thread, so everyone can see exactly how much of a "jack ass" I was."
It wasn't said in a PM dear, it was said in a thread and you were edited for breaking rules you agreed to follow. I see though that you are not giving the entire story. Dishonest again I see.
"That's hardly "chicken"."
Not mentioning this fact
"Third, I think you know fine well who "anonymous" is."
I do know who the second one is, he's Chrs in theology web. The second anonymous I have no idea who he/she/it is, but most likely a fundy atheist like you who runs some backwater blog.
"Isn't there something in the Bible about bearing "false witness", or didn't your B in English get you that far?"
I see you are too stupid to notice there are two anonymous that posted here. Sorry, no bearing false witnesses at all. I guess you're just too stupid to read, huh? Talk about embarrassment. So how much longer till you delete these post that show you for the idiot you are?
Hey Frogwarrior
Well you see I specifically put links in my post so people can see the relevant discussion for themselves. I called a "Christian" poster a liar because he repeatedly claimed the Bible said certain things; and then quoted Bible verses which said absolutely nothing of the sort. He did it repeatedly. I called him on it. He did it again. I called him a liar. If you think that makes me a jackass then gee whiz I suppose I can live with that. Maybe I should ask Jebus to forgive me?
Hey LilPixie
How stupid if me! I didn't know an anonymous comment was actually from a guy I've never heard of. Wow. I must be pretty damn stupid. I must be a complete imbecile. I must be a knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, toaster-forking, train-chickening, cat-microwaving, palin-voting idiot. Not stupid enough to be an evangelical Christian, but still pretty stupid.
No, wait a minute. It was obvious that there are two anonymous comments in this thread. It's obvious I was talking about the second one because I referred to it coming three minutes before you posted. Then your comment, 3 minutes after "anonymous", says "Who is anonymous? Too chicken to post your name?". So wait, did you know who made that second anonymous post or didn't you? i think you did. I think you knew fine well. I think you deliberately set out to decieve. And you have the hilarious gall to accuse me of lying.
And oops on my quote. i thought I'd cut and pasted it, but hey. I did say "Say hi to Jebus from me." You replied "You'll get to do that soon enough". I'll fix it. Thanks for pointing it out. See? I can freely admit that I make mistakes.
And for the umpteenth time, I put links in my post above so people can read the conversation for themselves. Stop trying to delude yourselves into thinking I was trying to hide something.
I'm delighted to leave these posts up for everyone to read, lilpixieofterror. They appeal to my "percussion complex".
"Well you see I specifically put links in my post so people can see the relevant discussion for themselves. I called a "Christian" poster a liar because he repeatedly claimed the Bible said certain things; and then quoted Bible verses which said absolutely nothing of the sort."
If he really thinks that, he is not a liar no matter what you like to think. He could be stupid or self deluded. Lying is going to the table with the intention not to tell the truth and if he didn't have the intention not to tell the truth, he is not lying. Still too dumb to understand that, huh?
"How stupid if me! I didn't know an anonymous comment was actually from a guy I've never heard of. "
You could of looked, but that would require some reading comprehension, eh?
"Wow. I must be pretty damn stupid."
Yes, you are pretty stupid. Thanks for admitting that (and before you rant that I don't understand you're being a smart mouth, I do and I'm just reporting in an equal way, since you seem to lack any kind of understanding of humor).
"I must be a complete imbecile. I must be a knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, toaster-forking, train-chickening, cat-microwaving, palin-voting idiot. Not stupid enough to be an evangelical Christian, but still pretty stupid."
Where did I say I was voting for Palin? I'm not even a republican nor do I call myself an evangelical Christian. Good job showing that you just throw up assumptions about people to hold onto your silly notions. I do find your consistent childish attacks against Palin to be quite childish, but no where did I say I'm voting for her, did I?
"No, wait a minute. It was obvious that there are two anonymous comments in this thread."
Very good! Maybe you're not as stupid as I thought (Your IQ just might be above 9).
"It's obvious I was talking about the second one because I referred to it coming three minutes before you posted."
I know that retard and I told you I was talking about the first one that posted. I know who the second one is because he told he was posting and what he was going to say before he said it. Wow, you just made an idiot of yourself, huh?
"Then your comment, 3 minutes after "anonymous", says "Who is anonymous? Too chicken to post your name?". So wait, did you know who made that second anonymous post or didn't you?"
There are two anonymous posters and at the time he (Chrs) posted that, I was in the process of writing out my first post and as such, I was not aware that he already posted until after he said something and after I posted. Never assume there is an easy explanation when you can just assume that everybody is out to get you, huh?
"i think you did. I think you knew fine well. I think you deliberately set out to decieve. And you have the hilarious gall to accuse me of lying."
Sorry, but this just goes to show how paranoid you are. I already explained it to you above and the evidence shows that there are two anonymous posters and my comments were directed at the first one, but I'm sure something that validates yourself in your own mind is so much better then an obvious explanation that explains all the facts at hand. I see you're still too stupid to notice there are two people who posted as anonymous and I was taking to the first one. Nice going moron; care to embarrass yourself some more?
"And oops on my quote. i thought I'd cut and pasted it, but hey. I did say "Say hi to Jebus from me." You replied "You'll get to do that soon enough". I'll fix it. Thanks for pointing it out. See? I can freely admit that I make mistakes."
Yep, so just keep showing everybody that you are being a complete smart ass and I gave an equally smart ass answer. Lol, you are quite an stupid and very entertaining atheist troll, that's for sure. Maybe next time you can tell everybody what the full PM really said, or do you want me to post them on here so everybody can see how you started a fight with me because you got mad that I edited you for breaking our rules?
"And for the umpteenth time, I put links in my post above so people can read the conversation for themselves. Stop trying to delude yourselves into thinking I was trying to hide something."
Listen stupid, I was not part of that conversation and they can't read the edited text. You broke the rules, you accused somebody of lying without evidence at the time and guess what... that is against the rules. Veiled profanity is against the rules too. Perhaps if you spent more time reading the rules and less time posting stupid pictures of youtube videos you might of had time to read the rules you agreed to follow.
"I'm delighted to leave these posts up for everyone to read, lilpixieofterror. They appeal to my "percussion complex"."
I see that you need to pick on minor spelling errors to help out your self esteem. I'm sure your whole 10 readers you get though here will love that. Too bad for you that you broke the rules and seem to think you're above following rules, huh? Anything else you like to accuse me of? You haven't accused me of being a prostitute yet... perhaps a drug habit? You're a pretty entertaining troll, that's for sure.
Hey! LilPixie... How nice of you to drop by again...
"Lying is going to the table with the intention not to tell the truth and if he didn't have the intention not to tell the truth, he is not lying. Still too dumb to understand that, huh?"
If you repeat an untruth after it's been demonstrated that it's untrue... You're saying that's not a lie? Interesting logic you've got going on there. I must be too dumb to understand that after all.
"You could of looked, but that would require some reading comprehension, eh?"
How could I have looked up who the anonymous poster was before, when I didn't know who he was until you told me? What's that got to do with reading comprehension?
Tell you what, my ten readers can read your comments for yourself if they like.
Best wishes
"Hey! LilPixie... How nice of you to drop by again..."
How nice of you to make excuses for why you're above the rules again!
"If you repeat an untruth after it's been demonstrated that it's untrue... You're saying that's not a lie? Interesting logic you've got going on there. I must be too dumb to understand that after all."
You didn't demonstrate it at all. You just called him a liar and repeated the same thing over and over again. Yet again... even if a person is being untruthful that doesn't make them a liar. Lying is when a person goes with an intent not to tell the truth while simply being stupid/ignorant isn't. Understand the difference now?
"How could I have looked up who the anonymous poster was before, when I didn't know who he was until you told me? What's that got to do with reading comprehension?"
Do you have a hard time understanding what I'm saying? It appears you do. Listen, I was responding to your first anonymous poster and I wasn't aware that chrs made a second post where he posted under anonymous until after I posted. My my... you just can't admit you made an error, huh?
"Tell you what, my ten readers can read your comments for yourself if they like."
I'm sure they will and those who have brains can see how big of a jack ass you were being and why you should of been edited. It was already explained you broke the rules, but it seems you still think you're above the rules that everybody else must follow. Keep acting foolish...
"My my... you just can't admit you made an error, huh?"
Now that we've finally worked out what happened, I'm happy to admit I made an error.
"Keep acting foolish..."
Thanks for the advice. Want some back? Lighten up, LilPixie. best wishes.
Post a Comment